10/02/2010
Compare
- Waterfall Model
- Prototype Model
SDLC
- Requirements/Analysis
- Design
- Implement
- Testing
- Deployment
- Maintenance
Requirements : can do
Sys requirements
User requirements
Client requirements
Specification(Unique) : it is
Prototype Documentation
Client meeting
Supervisor meeting
Journal
Suggest Modeling
Initial Step | Prototype Model |
And then | Chose Waterfall or Prototype Model |
Or | Some degree changeable from Prototype to Waterfall Model |
Prototype Model's Pros
- Better understanding of requirements
- Good starting point
Prototype Model's Cons
- The prototype may be used as a starting point rather than thrown away.
- The prototype typically have poor design and quality.
- Bad decisions during prototyping may propagate to the real product.
Waterfall Model vs Prototype Model
Prototype Strength
- No need much requirement/detail.
- Easy to accept changes in the middle of project.
- Usually get little resistance from users.
- Involve the user in analysis & design.
Waterfall Strength
- Can make a reliable system.
- Cost benefit & payback analysis are more clear & closed.
- Time & budget could estimate in front.
Prototype Weakness
- Cost benefit & payback analysis are not clear & only estimate.
- Budget & time must flexible.
- If goal not clear, subject requirements from user will involve.
Waterfall Weakness
- Need detail spec of what & how to get the target. (more req.)
- Need big effort & budget if something important change in the middle of project
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿